tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Nov 08 20:15:54 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: And then...? And then...? (And then along came Jones...) - For MO

• From: Steven Boozer <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: And then...? And then...? (And then along came Jones...) - For MO
• Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 21:38:25 -0600
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
• References: <l03020905b448fe9dd395@[206.150.216.46]>

ghunchu'wI':
> {rutlh} alone is enough of an unexpected treat.
 
charghwI':
: Surely, there is some historical Ruth associated with wheels. I 
: would have expected something like {vana'}, but I guess Okrand 
: thought that would be too obvious.

A "rut" is what wheels leave behind in some roads. (Ever seen the ruts on
ancient Roman roads -- e.g. the Appian Way or Pompeii?)

Besides, he's already made a Ruth pun: {beb} "roof". <g>


-- 
Voragh                       
Ca'Non Master of the Klingons 

• References:
  • Re: And then...? And then...? (And then along came Jones...) - For MO
    • From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
  • Re: And then...? And then...? (And then along came Jones...) - For MO
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: prefix trick = bad idea
• Next by Date: Phrasal doubts
• Prev by thread: Re: And then...? And then...? (And then along came Jones...) - For MO
• Next by thread: RE: And then...? And then...? (And then along came Jones...) - For MO
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level