tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 30 10:48:09 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qama'
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: qama'
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 13:48:04 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999 03:35:14 -0800 (PST) [email protected]
wrote:
> In a message dated 3/29/1999 7:05:49 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
> [email protected] writes:
>
> << Qoch ghaH 'e' vIlajlaH neH. vIvuvnISbe'.
>
> >poDlu'>>>>>>>>>>>>
>
> Holmaj vISaH. Holmaj vIQorghqang. Holmaj vIHubrup. Holmaj vIQannIS.
> tlhIngan Hol wIQanQo'chugh maH, Qan 'Iv'e'? >>
> ===========
> Suyajchu' vIneHmo' DIvI' Hol vIlo'.
>
> Actually, I consider the experts on this listserv to be the best persons with
> whom to discuss the possibilities of tlhIngan Hol, beyond the mere
> explanations given in TKD and what we can derive from canon usage in existence
> so far. I do like reading HolQeD, not just the interviews with MO himself,
> but also the experts' comments regarding areas which have not been fully
> illuminated by MO.
>
> SEI:) jabbI'IDghomvamDaq pab po'wI'pu' vIvuv. tlhIngan Hol wIlo'taHvIS
> mIwmey'e' DIlo'nISbogh DIbuSDI' mangachchuq. teH 'e'.
peHruS! yIqIm! mu' <<'e'>> Dalo'Ha'chu'pu'! batlh bIjatlh 'e'
DanIDba' 'ej ngoDvammo' qavuv, 'ach yIqIm! bejtaH taghwI'pu'.
DaghojHa'moH DaneHbe'ba'.
> paq HolQeD vIlaD 'e'
> vItIvqu'. rut paqvamDaq pab mu'mey je QIj MO. rut vuDmeylIj vIlaD. Hoch
> vItIv.
maj.
> peHruS
charghwI' 'utlh