tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 25 14:51:16 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: choH
I'm curious as to why you seem so excited about something you
think I said, especially since, so far as I can remember, I
didn't write anything in the discussion you have quoted.
ngerwIj 'oHbe' ngervam'e'. naDev pongwIj Dalo'DI' DubepmoHbogh
meq vIyajbe'.
charghwI' 'utlh
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999 07:24:28 -0800 (PST) David Trimboli
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Qu'vatlh!! QI'yaH!!!!
>
> What is the Klingon equivalent of "House of Cards"?
>
> nger 'oH neH charghwI' nger'e'! vIt 'oHpu' 'e' tobbe' vay'!
> lughbejbe'qu'!
>
> I don't really care if it's correct or not, but to start explaining OTHER
> grammar and vocabulary on theories based on other theories is folly.
>
> David Trimboli
> Information Services
> [email protected]
>
> jatlh DloraH:
> >: Do we have canon for [choH]?
> >: Is it transitive or intransitive? just want to be certain.
>
> It seems to be transitive except for that first one which uses a -moH.
>
> Maybe the first one is clipped for [(De'wI'vaD) HIvHe yIchoHmoH].