tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Jun 08 22:05:07 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Klingon hanky-panky

• From: Alan Anderson <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Klingon hanky-panky
• Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 23:51:53 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

ja'pu' Voragh:
>...How this applies to {bang} "love" (i.e. a lover or
>loved one) tells us much about Okrand's opinion of Klingon romance.

ja' qa'ral:
>How does this jibe with what else we know of Klingon sexual morality?

qech luDajchu' qID.  cha' Hol DaSovchugh, tlhaQ neH mu' tlhaQ.  pagh QIj.

It is irrelevant.  Cross-language puns are merely amusing; they don't say
anything about the meaning of the word in either language.

-- ghunchu'wI'

• References:
  • Klingon hanky-panky
    • From: Carleton Copeland <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: Hlchop (KLBC)
• Next by Date: 'oy'DI' QuchwIj, jIQuch!
• Prev by thread: Re: Klingon hanky-panky
• Next by thread: Re: Klingon hanky-panky
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level