tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 25 13:23:02 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: RE: KLBC: capitals in the writing system
- From: "Lieven L. Litaer" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: RE: KLBC: capitals in the writing system
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 21:59:17 +0100
ghItlh Dawut:
>Greetings
>
>I noticed this while catching up, so here's my belated two cents.
maHvaD Huch nob neH'a'?
>letters/words (though the fans and Klinguists disagree and have
>established unofficial associations for {pIqaD});
As you can see on my homepage :-)
>A middle ground would be to include the as-of-yet unofficial {pIqaD}
>amidst unassociated symbols, which would both act as separators for the
>{pIqaD} words while still being unreadable at a glance.
The letters on the gauntlets you can see everywhere mean {brchD}.
But of course we can even explain THAT: It's an abbreviation of something
:-)
>Can I say "Klinguists" and get away with it? I have also wondered about
>my use of the word "Klingonism." Perhaps I should mark them with an
>asterisk as is done with tlhIngan Hol?
I prefer "Klingonist". What is "Klingonism" supposed to be? Sounds too much
like a sect... What about "Klingdom"?
Qapla'
Quvar muHwI'
http://members.aol.com/lieven/