tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 25 12:07:52 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: you lost me here...
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: you lost me here...
- Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 15:07:48 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:09:25 -0800 (PST) Marc Paige
<[email protected]> wrote:
> QIn *Nic* DamughDI' 'e' vItIv 'ach mu'tlheghvam DamughDI' chomISmoH.
>
> I enjoyed your translation of Nic's message, but you lost me on this
> part.
>
> >>>
> > anyway, just had to get it out my system.
>
> QInvam vIlobpa' munuQqu' qechvam. DaH matlhab qechvam jIH je.
> <<<
> this idea really bothered me before I obeyed this message. Now, this
> idea an I are independent.
>
> I get the independent part and like the analogy, but the first part
> makes no sense unless you mis-typed *lob* for some other verb. If that
> is not the case, please explain.
>
> SI'IluD
HIvqa' veqlargh! QInvam vIlab. vIlobbe'ba'.
charghwI' 'utlh