Re: you lost me here...

["William H. Martin" <whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu>]

On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 09:09:25 -0800 (PST) Marc Paige 
<marc.paige@platinum.com> wrote:

> QIn *Nic* DamughDI' 'e' vItIv 'ach mu'tlheghvam DamughDI' chomISmoH.
> 
> I enjoyed your translation of Nic's message, but you lost me on this
> part.
> 
> >>>
> > anyway, just had to get it out my system.
> 
> QInvam vIlobpa' munuQqu' qechvam. DaH matlhab qechvam jIH je.
> <<<
> this idea really bothered me before I obeyed this message. Now, this
> idea an I are independent.
> 
> I get the independent part and like the analogy, but the first part
> makes no sense unless you mis-typed *lob* for some other verb. If that
> is not the case, please explain.
> 
> SI'IluD

HIvqa' veqlargh! QInvam vIlab. vIlobbe'ba'.

charghwI' 'utlh