you lost me here...

["Marc Paige" <marc.paige@platinum.com>]

QIn *Nic* DamughDI' 'e' vItIv 'ach mu'tlheghvam DamughDI' chomISmoH.

I enjoyed your translation of Nic's message, but you lost me on this
part.

>>>
> anyway, just had to get it out my system.

QInvam vIlobpa' munuQqu' qechvam. DaH matlhab qechvam jIH je.
<<<
this idea really bothered me before I obeyed this message. Now, this
idea an I are independent.

I get the independent part and like the analogy, but the first part
makes no sense unless you mis-typed *lob* for some other verb. If that
is not the case, please explain.

SI'IluD