tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 25 09:01:24 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

you lost me here...

• From: "Marc Paige" <[email protected]>
• Subject: you lost me here...
• Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 11:01:09 -0600
• Importance: Normal

QIn *Nic* DamughDI' 'e' vItIv 'ach mu'tlheghvam DamughDI' chomISmoH.

I enjoyed your translation of Nic's message, but you lost me on this
part.

>>>
> anyway, just had to get it out my system.

QInvam vIlobpa' munuQqu' qechvam. DaH matlhab qechvam jIH je.
<<<
this idea really bothered me before I obeyed this message. Now, this
idea an I are independent.

I get the independent part and like the analogy, but the first part
makes no sense unless you mis-typed *lob* for some other verb. If that
is not the case, please explain.

SI'IluD

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: you lost me here...
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: qawmoHwI'
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: double -bogh verbs
• Prev by thread: 'IwHIq nab (RE: Weird request....)
• Next by thread: Re: you lost me here...
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level