tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 21 23:07:43 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: qama'
In a message dated 2/19/1999 1:43:28 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<<
{'ar} is not combined with {-logh}. {'ar} is simply one question
word. {'arlogh} is another. The idea that {'ar} can take
suffixes is something you made up. There is no place in TKD that
says it can. >>
Perhaps I am mistaken. I really did think MO gave us a combination of {'ar}
and the number suffix {-logh}. That was just too obvious. I did not even
consider the possibility that this is a whole new word with no relationship to
those two syllables. I guess that {nuqDaq} really is not a combination of
{nuq} and {-Daq}, to follow your logic.
So, if {'arDIch} comes to pass, it won't be because {'ar} is taking the number
suffix
{-DIch}, either. It will be a whole new word without association to those
obvious parts when you enter it into your dictionary.
peHruS