tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Feb 21 23:13:19 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hoch
In a message dated 2/19/1999 2:03:30 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
<< Meanwhile, I do believe that {naQ roj} is a valid sentence. "The
peace is complete." The verb is functioning toward a meaning
that {Hoch} could not perform.
>>
I agree that {naQ roj} is a valid sentence. I do not claim that {naQ} can
only be a verb (functioning as an adjective to use the English grammar
terminology) following a noun. I really need to see {naQ} in canon sentences
to gain a deeper understanding of its nuances, then.
Meanwhile, I feel that {QIm naQ yIlo'} means "Use the entire egg, not just
part of it." My difficulty was in the connotation brought forth in English
about a chemical substance being incomplete somehow. Even the Klingon word
{HutlhHa'} seems preferable.
peHruS