tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 18 22:02:34 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: qama'

In a message dated 2/18/1999 3:52:42 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
whm2m@server1.mail.virginia.edu writes:

<< 'arlogh} wasn't a word until Okrand gave it to us. {'arDIch} is 
 not a word yet, and likely won't be.
 
 {'arlogh} addressed a concept that could not be recast. There 
 was no other way to ask the question {'arlogh} asked.
  >>

Actually, {'arDIch} should have a good chance.  It follows exactly the same
logic as {'arlogh}.  {-DIch} is a number suffix!!!

peHruS

Back to archive top level