tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 10 08:04:47 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Monster verb construction - does this work?
Joel Peter Anderson wrote:
> I don't anticipate ever using this in a sentence (I'm doubt it even
> expresses a coherent thought). However, as an example, and as a mnemonic
> or chart of all the verb suffixes in action does this work? And, for that
> matter, can someone suggest a better construction? (My aim was to have a
> handy word like the noun QaghHommeyHeylIjmo' that uses all of the nominal
> suffixes 1-5):
>
> bIHup'eghnISbe'qa'moHlaHbejtaHneS'a'
>
> d'Armond's pojwI' didn't blink at this and yielded:
How did you get pojwI' to show you the whole thing? Can you wrap long lines?
When I tried the sentence it cut off in the middle of "on-going".
K'ryntes
>
>
> you (yes/no)? honorific on-going certainly can cause todo again
> not need to oneself punish
>
> (Whatever *that* means!)
>
> joel anderson * http://members.aol.com/JPKlingon * [email protected]
> **mIghghachvo' yImej 'ej yIQaQ; roj yInej 'ej Dochvam yItlha'**
> **Depart from evil, and do good; Seek peace, and pursue it**