Re: Monster verb construction - does this work?

["K'ryntes" <yoshi@surfshop.net>]

Joel Peter Anderson wrote:

> I don't anticipate ever using this in a sentence (I'm doubt it even
> expresses a coherent thought).  However, as an example, and as a mnemonic
> or chart of all the verb suffixes in action does this work?  And, for that
> matter, can someone suggest a better construction?  (My aim was to have a
> handy word like the noun QaghHommeyHeylIjmo' that uses all of the nominal
> suffixes 1-5):
>
>    bIHup'eghnISbe'qa'moHlaHbejtaHneS'a'
>
> d'Armond's pojwI' didn't blink at this and yielded:

How did you get pojwI' to show you the whole thing? Can you wrap long lines?
When I tried the sentence it cut off in the middle of "on-going".

K'ryntes

>
>
>  you (yes/no)? honorific on-going certainly can cause todo again
>         not need to oneself punish
>
> (Whatever *that* means!)
>
>    joel anderson * http://members.aol.com/JPKlingon * JPKlingon@aol.com
>  **mIghghachvo' yImej 'ej yIQaQ; roj yInej 'ej Dochvam yItlha'**
>      **Depart from evil, and do good; Seek peace, and pursue it**