tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 09 11:32:54 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: {HoSDo'} inherently plural?
- From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: {HoSDo'} inherently plural?
- Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 14:32:44 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- Priority: NORMAL
I don't know about you, but I've found energy beings often quite
difficult to count. They tend to cluster, you know. The lines
are blurred. I never know how many of them I'm talking to and
they never tell. So far as I know, I've never seen just one of
them. They are not discrete.
Yep. Don't ever tell an energy being any of your secrets.
charghwI' 'utlh
On Tue, 9 Feb 1999 04:24:03 -0800 (PST) Dawut <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> On TKD pages 89 and 131, we see:
> HoSDo' (n) energy beings
>
> Is {HoSDo'} inherently plural?
>
> If {HoSDo'} takes pluralizers, are the suffixes indicating linguistic capability used?
>
> *HoSDo'pu' law' vIleghpu' (?)
> I have seen many energy beings.
>
> *HoSDo' Soch vIleghpu' (?)
> I have seen seven energy beings.
>
> ***
> Dawut (David)