tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Feb 09 04:08:26 1999

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

KLBC: {HoSDo'} inherently plural?

• From: Dawut <[email protected]>
• Subject: KLBC: {HoSDo'} inherently plural?
• Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 04:08:03 -0800

Greetings.

On TKD pages 89 and 131, we see:
   HoSDo' (n) energy beings

Is {HoSDo'} inherently plural?

If {HoSDo'} takes pluralizers, are the suffixes indicating linguistic capability used?

*HoSDo'pu' law' vIleghpu' (?)
I have seen many energy beings.

*HoSDo' Soch vIleghpu' (?)
I have seen seven energy beings.

***
Dawut (David)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: KLBC: {HoSDo'} inherently plural?
    • From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Digest mode???
• Next by Date: RE: It is by caffeine alone
• Prev by thread: RE: Digest mode???
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: {HoSDo'} inherently plural?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level