tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 13 06:27:48 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
- From: TPO <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 09:27:08 -0500
>>changing wI- to ma- doesn't make it clipped.
>>with or without -Daq, it should be wI-.
>
>No. That's not what I meant. I meant that the sentence can be
>interpereted as:
>
> "nImbuS wej maghoS" We are going to Nimbus III. "He yInab." Plot the
>course.
no it can't because you can't have ma- without -Daq when you have an object
in the sentence (nImbuS wej)
If it was clipped you wouldn't bother with the ma- either.
>>
>>If you do use ma- then you have to use -Daq,
>
>Not so. When useing "ghoS", the "Daq" suffix is not requiered.
If you have ma- on the ghoS you do! (if there is an object)
nImbuS wej wIghoS
- we go to Nimbus III
nImbuS wejDaq wIghoS
- we go to Nimbus III
nImbuS wejDaq maghoS
- ON Nimbus III, we are going (somewhere)
nImbuS wej maghoS
[This combination is not allowed]
DloraH