tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Dec 13 11:55:08 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
- From: SuSvaj <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 15:14:47 -0500
At 09:27 AM 12/13/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>>If you do use ma- then you have to use -Daq,
>>
>>Not so. When useing "ghoS", the "Daq" suffix is not requiered.
>
>If you have ma- on the ghoS you do! (if there is an object)
>
>
>nImbuS wej wIghoS
>- we go to Nimbus III
>
>nImbuS wejDaq wIghoS
>- we go to Nimbus III
>
>nImbuS wejDaq maghoS
>- ON Nimbus III, we are going (somewhere)
>
>nImbuS wej maghoS
>[This combination is not allowed]
I still can't shake the feeling that the implicit locative notion in "ghoS"
makes this acceptable. It may be that after hearing this in STV I simply
accepted it as cannon and got used to the idea of this kind of
construction. Does anyone else have an opinion they'd like to chime in here?
SuSvaj
>
>
>DloraH
>
>
>