Re: Nautical Directions/Navigation

[SuSvaj <zayericd@pilot.msu.edu>]

At 09:27 AM 12/13/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>>
>>>If you do use ma- then you have to use -Daq, 
>>
>>Not so.  When useing "ghoS", the "Daq" suffix is not requiered.
>
>If you have ma- on the ghoS you do! (if there is an object)
>
>
>nImbuS wej wIghoS
>- we go to Nimbus III
>
>nImbuS wejDaq wIghoS
>- we go to Nimbus III
>
>nImbuS wejDaq maghoS
>- ON Nimbus III, we are going (somewhere)
>
>nImbuS wej maghoS
>[This combination is not allowed]

I still can't shake the feeling that the implicit locative notion in "ghoS"
makes this acceptable.  It may be that after hearing this in STV I simply
accepted it as cannon and got used to the idea of this kind of
construction.  Does anyone else have an opinion they'd like to chime in here?

SuSvaj







>
>
>DloraH
>
>
>