tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 08 16:18:06 1999
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Hol vI'lo 'e' vInID (cha')
- From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Hol vI'lo 'e' vInID (cha')
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 17:19:26 -0700
jatlh tuv'el:
> KLBC: Hol vI'lo 'e' vInID (cha')
maj.
jIjatlh:
> ...
>> ghay'cha'! chay' ta'lu'????
>
> "^#&%'$#&'! How was this done????"
maj.
>>> tajvetlh HInob!
>>> Give me that knife!
>
>> maj. Good use of the "prefix trick".
>
> Heheh. Well, I haven't read that part of the FAQ yet,
> so I have no idea what the prefix trick is.
You know how to use it whether you've read about it or not.
> mu'tlheghmey chu':
>
> SuqetlaH 'ach SuSo'laHbe'.
> You can run, but you can't hide.
maj.
> SaleghlaHchu' 'ach tuleghlaHbe'.
> I can see you guys clearly, but you can't see me.
Ah, fun with underused prefixes. maj.
> qatlh tulehglaHbe'? ghevI'rajDaq jISo'mo'!
> Why can't you see me?
> Because I'm hiding in your gagh sauce!
'up! The second sentence has no main clause, and is therefore not a complete
sentence. That's probably OK in this type of writing, though.
> taHqeq! tuSopQo'qu'!
> [Idiots]! Don't you dare eat me!
Cute self censorship in DIvI' Hol. The second sentence is an imperative, so
it has to use the imperative prefix <HI-> rather than <tu->.
> SunIDchugh nujlIj 'aqroS meQmeH
> nISwI'HIchwIj vIlo'!
> If you try, I'll burn the roof of your mouth
> with my disruptor pistol!
> (I have a nasty feeling about this sentence. Ah well.)
You've switched from addressing a group to a single person. Was that
intentional? Also, while you can often drop the prefix or <-lu'> from a verb
with <-meH>, I think this is a case where it is necessary, or at least
better. I'd say <... vImeQmeH ...> here.
pagh
Beginners' Grammarian
tlhIngan Hol Mailing List FAQ
http://www.bigfoot.com/~dspeers/klingon/faq.htm