tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Mar 12 12:23:55 1998

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: puqloDwI' lut

• From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: puqloDwI' lut
• Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 15:23:50 -0500 (EST)
• In-Reply-To: <7107ECAEC9ECD0119BBC00805F684B9C04A7E8@VIPER> from "Andeen, Eric" at Mar 11, 98 03:10:17 pm

According to Andeen, Eric:
> 
> majQa'! reH jabbI'IDlIj lururbogh jabbI'ID'e' vIlaD 'e' vItIv. tlhIngan
> Hol Dalo'taHvIS, ghu' DaDelchu'. yIlabtaH!
> 
> This message was not marked as KLBC, so I am going to jump in and take a
> swing at it. The grammar is quite good, but I will make a few
> suggestions.
> 
> ghItlh SI'IluD:
> > qaStaHvIS Hogh jajmey Qab, HatlhDaq raQ wIchenmoH puqloDwI' 
> > jIH je. *Boy Scout* chu' 'oH.
> 
> jIgheSnIS: nIteb Hatlh boDan'a'? lItlhej'a' latlh loDHom nejwI'pu'?

Apparently pagh understands the phrase {qaStaHvIS Hogh jajmey
Qab}. I don't. Care to enlighten me? To me, it looks like,
"While the theragen of the week's days happened," and that
doesn't make a lot of sense to me.

The rest of the commentary was dead on. I enjoyed both the
original and pagh's responses.

> pagh

charghwI'

• References:
  • RE: puqloDwI' lut
    • From: "Andeen, Eric" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: fiction
• Next by Date: Re: charghwI' wanI'
• Prev by thread: RE: puqloDwI' lut
• Next by thread: RE: puqloDwI' lut
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level