tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jun 18 14:14:25 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: SIS
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: SIS
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 19:09:18 -0400
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>In a message dated 98-06-15 22:53:58 EDT, charghwI' writes about SuStel's
>comments:
>
><< Wouldn't that be {nungbogh Hoch Hogh}? Drop the {-bogh} and
> "Each week proceeds" would certainly be {nunbogh Hoch Hogh}. If
> "Each week" is the subject of {nungbogh}, I would definitely
> expect {Hoch} to be after {nungbogh}. Meanwhile, when I saw
> this, I saw:
>
> "The week which preceeds everything." >>
>
>I have to agree with charghwI' here.
Hoch nungbogh Hogh
each "week-which-precedes"
nungbogh Hoch Hogh
"each-week" which precedes
If you can talk about {nungbogh Hogh} "week which precedes" as a unit, then
you should be able to talk about "each unit." {Hoch [nungbogh Hogh]}.
{Hoch} is not the object of the relative clause.
SuStel
Stardate 98461.2