tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jun 01 09:25:03 1998
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: On (was Off) topic: ...
- From: Marc Ruehlaender <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: On (was Off) topic: ...
- Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 11:24:04 CDT
ja' charghwI':
> <<latlh Hol>> Dalo' 'e' vIpIH. *Okrand* chovnatlhna'Daq DIp
> tlha' <<latlh>> not 'e' vIlu'. chaq vISamHa'pu'.
>
va! DIp 'oH <<latlh>>'e' 'e' vIqawbe'qa'. <<pIm>> vIlo'nIS jay'.
> > <<yajHa'lu'>>, <<yajlu'chu'>> je vIghItlhtaHvIS, Hutlhmo' <<-laH>>,
> > cha' mu'tlheghvam yajHa'be'lu'. bIQoch'a'?
>
> ghaytan tlha'Ha'chuqpu' mu'meylIj. <<...<-laH> Hutlhmo'...>>
> 'e' vIpIH. Do the suffixes lack, or do the words lack the
> suffixes?
>
vIjanglaHbe'. <<Hutlh>> lo''a' Marc Okrand?
> > jatlh Human bIDwIj... jatlh tlHIngan bIDwI':
> > tlHIngan jIH }}:-}
>
> tlhIngan bID neH Daghajchugh vaj chaq mu' <<tlhoS>> Dalo'laH...
>
bIDo'... bIjatlhtaHvIS, qImbe' tlhIngan bIDwI'...
Marc Ruehlaender
aka HomDoq
[email protected]