tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 12 00:51:46 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re:
- From: Qov <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re:
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 00:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
At 05:11 AM 9/11/97 -0700, Guido #1 wrote:
>Qum Qov:
>>If the conversation was slow, on a restricted topic and allowed a fair
>>amount of repetition could we count thirty or forty who could do it? Am I
>>wildly optimistic or short? Does it count if the other person spends four of
>>the five minutes looking up things in the dictionary? :)
>
>Nice to see someone placing such good stock in the qualifications. One true
>minute of slow, belabored, unspontaneous speech on a restricted topic?
mu'ghom lo'qu'wI'pu' vIqeltaHvIS jIqID. vIQIjchu'be' jItlhIj.
>"Wildly optimistic" is the most ironic phrase you could have used.
>I believe the spirit of your message was definitely enthusiastic, but the
>concessions made in it, well, I wasn't at qep'a'.
bISaHbe'bej 'ej laHchaj DaQoybe'. wa'ben mughwI' vIpoQDI' jInejnIS. qep'a'
loSDIchDaq mughwI' vIpoQDI' Dat jatlhwI'pu' tu'lu'. le'ba' laHlIj 'ej
nIqaDbogh chu'wI'pu' tu'lu'be'.
>but certainly you can say anything you
>want about Klingonists depending on where your standards are.
tlhIngan Hol jatlhchu'chugh Hoch jIbelba' Guido 'ach teHbe'ba'.
*standard*qoqmeywIj DaSovbe'chugh vaj maQumtaHvIS maH jIQumbejbe'pu'.
tlhIngan Hol jatlhchu' pagh, 'ach qaStaHvIS vagh tup jatlhmeH Qatlhqu'be'
Qu' 'ej luchavlaH nuvpu' law'.
Qov ([email protected])
Beginners' Grammarian