tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 07 05:02:34 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
bom puqloDwI'!
- From: [email protected] (Bill Willmerdinger)
- Subject: bom puqloDwI'!
- Date: Thu, 06 Mar 1997 12:42:02
> jatlh Qob:
>> QoQ *Qanqor* ta vIghaj 'ej wItlhej.
> <*Qanqor* QoQ ta> yIjatlh. pagh <*Qanqor QoQ> yIjatlh. 'utbe'law'
> <ta> 'ej moH.
<*Qanqor* QoQ ta> vIjatlh net Sov. vIghItlhtaHvIS jIqImbe'.
qatlh moH <ta>? *cassette tape*Daq QoQ ta vIghaj; QoQ vIghajbe'. (QoQ
ghajbe'lu', qar'a'?)
>> Note: I have never been able to come up with a good translation of
>> "conquest". {chargh} "conquer" is not quite right, nor is
>> {charghwI'}: I need "the act of conquering" not "one who conquers".
>> The best I can do is {charghtaHghach},
>> which is probably closest: "continuous conqueration". Comments?
> mu'vam vIyaj. bIcharghtaHchugh, vaj mu' lugh 'oH <charghtaHghach>'e'.
> bIcharghlI'chugh, vaj mu' lugh 'oH <charghlI'ghach>'e'.
> bIcharghta'chugh, vaj mu' lugh 'oH <charghta'ghach>'e'. ghaytanHa'
> bIcharghpu'qu'.
chaq, bong vay' Dacharghchugh, vaj mu' lugh 'oH <charghpu'ghach>'e'.
<'orghenya'nganpu' DIchargh 'e' wItagh. 'orghenya'Daq maDuvtaHvIS yuQ tInqu'
maS wIDan. waw' wIcher. tugh toq yuQ 'e' wItu' 'ej DIHIvpa' jegh nganpu'.
bong yuQ nganpu' DIchargh. *Ewoks* 'oH pongchaj'e'.>
>> Also, I realize that my use of {tlhej} "accompany" is probably wrong, but
it
>> was all I could think of.
> chaq loQ lugh. mayIttaHvIS, chotlhegh. maSoptaHvIS, chotlhegh.
> mabomtaHvIS, chotlhegh.
<chotlhej> DaghItlh 'e' DanID, qar'a'? <m>
>> Did *any* of it make sense? <g>
> Hoch vIyaj.
jIQuch. tlhIngan Hol vIqeqmeH, pIj nI'be' poHwIj tlhab.
Qob la' (tlh.w.D. quttaj ra'wI')
tlhIngan Hol yejHaD qhojwI'