tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Mar 02 07:32:06 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Hol vIlo' (was Re: Holna' wIlo'bejtaH)
- From: DaQtIq <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Hol vIlo' (was Re: Holna' wIlo'bejtaH)
- Date: Sun, 02 Mar 1997 10:31:33 -0500
jIHvaD jang Joel Peter Anderson:
>> pab bIvDI' vay', DalughmoH'a'? ghobe'.
>
>I beg your pardon - in the right circumstance, I will correct the grammar.
maj. 'ach ghu' lugh yIDel.
>> bIHagh,
>
>jIHagh. qatlh? jIQuch. bIQuch'a'?
rut jIQuch. Hovmey vIvantaHvIS, jIQuch. be' 'IH DIr vIHottaHvIS, jIQuch.
vIng Human 'e' vIQoyDI', jIQuchHa'choH.
>> 'ej bIja: <potlhbe' pab.> potlh meq'e'.>
>
>Dochvam vIjatlhbe'.
vaj qayajHa', DIvI' Hol Dalo'taHvIS:
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 11:26:20 -0800
Author: Joel Peter Anderson ([email protected])
Subject: Hol vIlo' (was Re: Holna' wIlo'bejtaH)
>Especially with kids, the idea of the language - the possibilty of using
>it at ALL, can be *wonderful*. When I've been presented with a story that
>pretty much uses Klingon terms like "coded English", I'll comment briefly
>about that, but then go on to translate it with the author and enjoy the
>effort they put into it. Sure seemed like we *both* won to me. And I
>don't recall any suffering.
toH! pab potlh law' meq potlh puS pagh meq potlh law' pab potlh puS?
- DaQtIq