tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Jan 13 18:27:28 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Hello (son of)

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: Hello (son of)
• Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 21:27:26 -0500 (EST)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>([email protected])

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>Date: Sun, 12 Jan 1997 23:23:41 -0800
>From: [email protected]
>
>So, is {SoSchIm} not canon.  After all, it has been in use.  We even get it
>from TNG.  Perhaps we need a clearer statement of what is canon, then.  I am
>inclined to use just about everything we see on this listserv.

I thought we had a definition out there already.

Canon is anything told to us by (or approved by) Marc Okrand, so far as
tlhIngan Hol is concerned (and nothing else).  There was a debate on this a
while ago regarding "canonical Klingon" vs. "canonical tlhIngan Hol";
you'll find it in the archives.

~mark

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBMtru8MppGeTJXWZ9AQGAFwMAnAlzXz7ibk3KTvyYkNSPvFxmKxLqn53j
JroK+QvwvRcRn50mTXQbbFX7mEMplqK1olwaBpTUAchIlKfx9CRykYlxjGtTMMXL
yt57W21ReD+odhtSbKOsc/oPDpbG7wVX
=T2Bd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• References:
  • Re: Hello (son of)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: KLBC: naDev bIrbejqu'!
• Next by Date: Re: chay'
• Prev by thread: Re: Hello (son of)
• Next by thread: RE: Hello (son of)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level