tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Jan 11 15:16:08 1997

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

RE: KLBC: Duj ghoStaH



January 10, 1997 8:34 AM EST, jatlh [email protected]:

> Duj ghoStah
> 
> I can't find a definition that makes sense for the taH 
> suffix on ghoS
> 
> TKD gives ghoStaH: it is approaching it
> 
> I feel im missing something here.

{-taH} isn't a suffix which has a one-for-one meaning with something else in 
English.  TKD suggests "It is approaching it" instead of "It approaches it."  
The concept is: in {ghoStaH}, the action of approaching is continuous; it is 
proceeding as of the time in question.  {ghoS} has no indication of whether or 
not the action is continuous.  Usually, when I see {ghoS}, I don't assume that 
an action is in progress, but hasn't finished yet; I just see the action 
happen, and that's the end of it.

{ghoStaH Duj} "The ship is approaching."  Even as we speak, the ship is 
getting closer to our location (although there's no indication that we are the 
ship's destination; if you want that, use the suffix {-lI'}).

{ghoS Duj} "The ship approaches."  When the sentence is done, I'd assume that 
the ship is now next to you.  There is no sense of "still happening."  It's 
done.

> On a second note, what does the list feel about IHoS as a name.
> It dosent mean anything and it starts with a vowel but I kind of like 
> it. Opinions?

It's your call.  I'll just say that when I pronounce {IHoS}, I'm going to be 
adding a glottal stop to the beginning most of the time ({'IHoS}).  I can say 
it without it, but it takes a great deal of effort.

-- 
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 97031.5


Back to archive top level