tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 05 23:50:04 1997
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Initiation Rites
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Initiation Rites
- Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1997 02:49:33 -0500
In a message dated 97-01-03 03:03:04 EST, you write:
<< tlhIngan loDnI'pu':
SuvwI'vam chu' wIlIHmeH maghomDI' ben SuvwI' noyqu' ghaHbogh qeylIS
paqDI'norghDaj je DIbuSmeH DaH poH puS wIlo'
tIQoy': SuvwI' patlh chavta' pong
batlh tlhIngan wo' veSqa' tuq je toy'jaj pong 'ej *Sto-vo-kor* wIpawpu'DI'
batlh 'ejyo' qIj toy'taH ghaH
Qapla'! pong, tIqlIj Da'angrup'a'
nad mIw'a'
1. tlhIngan Hol Dajatlh'a'
2. qatlh veSqa' tuq DajeS DaneH
3. chay' tlhIngan Da vay'
4. nuq bIH tlhIngan yIn ghob tIgh je'e' 'e' DaQub
5. veSqa' tuqvaD nuq DachavlaH
6. qunmaj qelbogh nuq DaSov
7. chay' DajeS 'e' DaHech
8. latlh DIvI'mey DajeStaH'a'
9. latlh qechmey Daja' DaneH'a'
qI': ______________________________
Please review and comment.
peHruS, veSqa' tuq rIp
>>
I am still looking for corrections to errors in the above text. If I do not
receive any comments, am I to assume that it is absolutely correct?
Thank you.
peHruS