tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Sep 24 08:04:13 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: responding to KLBC posts

• From: Niall Hosking <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: responding to KLBC posts
• Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 16:04:05 +0100 (BST)
• In-Reply-To: <v01520d01ae6d7f33bd6f@[205.139.170.201]> from "Alan Anderson" at Sep 24, 96 05:16:24 am

> 
> >. is there anything wrong with beginners responding to beginners under the
> >KLBC header, provided that we don't actually correct eachother ?
> 
> In a word, yes.
> 
> Letting the Beginners' Grammarian respond before *anyone* else says anything
> has a threefold benefit:

Good point. I suppose I should have maybe not made my post KLBC....I
suppose I can repost it with an open header to bypass this problem...I'm
not sure I can wait for trI'Qal!

qSeroHS :)
-- 
Niall Hosking
aka Kserokhs Vaene
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
http://www.gla.ac.uk/Clubs/WebSoc/~884744ho

'Practise random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.'

• References:
  • responding to KLBC posts
    • From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)

• Prev by Date: Re: What prefix to use for "I--us" etc.?
• Next by Date: Re: juHHom chu' vIghajchoH
• Prev by thread: responding to KLBC posts
• Next by thread: 'The Deadly Field', Eskimo language, and tlhIngan Hol
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level