tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Sep 23 13:35:56 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
- From: [email protected]
- Subject: Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 1996 16:35:23 -0400
96-09-22 17:44:39 EDT, jatlh janSIy:
[jIjatlhpu':]
> > > "vav jIH. qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov."
> > Your sentence does, however, clear up the unforseen ambiguity of my
> > sentence. And for a good inbetween...
> > vav jIH 'e' vISov qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey
nIvba' mu'tlheghvam.
> reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'
>
> On further consideration, I don't suppose my original sentence works,
> after all. Just out of curiosity, what about...
> vav jIH qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov
rap mu'tlheghvam mu'tlheghwIj je. ram "period". 'ach qaqbej mu'tlheghlIj
cha'DIch (". . . 'e' vISov qaStaHvIS . . .").
SuStel
Stardate 96728.3