Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej

[Jeremy Cowan <J-Cowan@neiu.edu>]

> > >  qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey vav jIH 'e' vISov

> On Fri, 20 Sep 1996 SuStel wrote:
> > mu'tlheghmeyvam Dalo' DaneHlaw':
> > 
> > "vav jIH.  qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov."

On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Jeremy Cowan wrote:
> mu'tlhegh vIlo'bogh vIlo' vIneH
> Your sentence does, however, clear up the unforseen ambiguity of my 
> sentence.  And for a good inbetween...
> vav jIH 'e' vISov qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey

reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'

On further consideration, I don't suppose my original sentence works, 
after all.  Just out of curiosity, what about...
vav jIH qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov

janSIy