tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 22 14:36:41 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej

• From: Jeremy Cowan <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
• Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 16:35:13 -0500 (CDT)
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

> > >  qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey vav jIH 'e' vISov

> On Fri, 20 Sep 1996 SuStel wrote:
> > mu'tlheghmeyvam Dalo' DaneHlaw':
> > 
> > "vav jIH.  qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov."

On Fri, 20 Sep 1996, Jeremy Cowan wrote:
> mu'tlhegh vIlo'bogh vIlo' vIneH
> Your sentence does, however, clear up the unforseen ambiguity of my 
> sentence.  And for a good inbetween...
> vav jIH 'e' vISov qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey

reH Suvrup SuvwI''a'

On further consideration, I don't suppose my original sentence works, 
after all.  Just out of curiosity, what about...
vav jIH qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov

janSIy

• References:
  • Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
    • From: Jeremy Cowan <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: {wa'DIch} as adverb?
• Next by Date: Re: jIlIH'eghqa'
• Prev by thread: Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
• Next by thread: Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level