tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Sep 20 18:33:39 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej
On Fri, 20 Sep 1996 SuStel wrote:
> > lut wa'
> > qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey vav jIH 'e' vISov
>
> mu'tlheghmeyvam Dalo' DaneHlaw':
>
> "vav jIH. qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov."
mu'tlhegh vIlo'bogh vIlo' vIneH
Your sentence does, however, clear up the unforseen ambiguity of my
sentence. And for a good inbetween...
vav jIH 'e' vISov qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey
> > lut cha'
> > tlhIngan Hol jatlhbogh *residency* ra'wI''e' tu'lu' 'e' vIja'pu'
>
> <-pu'> ghajlaHbe' wot cha'DIch. "tlhIngan Hol jatlhbogh *residency*
> ra'wI''e' tu'lu'pu' 'e' vIja'" bIjatlhnIS.
Hagh qoHpu' neH HeghtaHvIS SuvwI'pu'
Thanks for the comments.
janSIy