Re: naDev yIHmey tu'be'lu'bej

[Jeremy Cowan <J-Cowan@neiu.edu>]

On Fri, 20 Sep 1996 SuStel wrote:
> > lut wa'
> >  qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey vav jIH 'e' vISov
> 
> mu'tlheghmeyvam Dalo' DaneHlaw':
> 
> "vav jIH.  qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey 'e' vISov."

mu'tlhegh vIlo'bogh vIlo' vIneH
Your sentence does, however, clear up the unforseen ambiguity of my 
sentence.  And for a good inbetween...
vav jIH 'e' vISov qaStaHvIS cha' Hoghmey

> >  lut cha'
> >  tlhIngan Hol jatlhbogh *residency* ra'wI''e' tu'lu' 'e' vIja'pu'
> 
> <-pu'> ghajlaHbe' wot cha'DIch.  "tlhIngan Hol jatlhbogh *residency*
> ra'wI''e' tu'lu'pu' 'e' vIja'" bIjatlhnIS.

Hagh qoHpu' neH HeghtaHvIS SuvwI'pu'

Thanks for the comments.
janSIy