tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 08 20:11:28 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
- From: [email protected] (HoD trI'Qal)
- Subject: RE: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 23:12:29 -0400
At 10:01 PM 8/30/96 -0700, Chet Braun wrote:
[...]
>Section 3.2.2 mentions that a verb followed by <-wI'> can form a noun.
>Additionally 4.2.9 defines <-wI'> as a type 9 verb suffix. As if that is not
>enough under Klingon Affixes, 3. Verb suffixes <-wI'> is listed as a type 9
>verb suffix and a few pages later indexed by the English it's listed again.
>Granted <-wI'> is also a type 4 noun suffix indicating possesive.
Please don't reply to grammar quesions before the BG does. Okay? Okay.
Thanks.
>HetaQ
--tQ
---
HoD trI'Qal, tlhIngan wo' Duj lIy So' ra'wI'
Captain T'rkal, Commander IKV Hidden Comet (Klingon speaker and net junkie!)
HaghtaHbogh tlhIngan yIvoqQo'! toH... qatlh HaghtaH Qanqor HoD???
monlI'bogh tlhInganbe' yIvoqQo'! SoHvaD monlI' trI'Qal...