tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Sep 08 20:11:18 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
- From: [email protected] (HoD trI'Qal)
- Subject: Re: KLBC - handle: <'uchmeHwI' > or <'uchmeHghach> ????
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 1996 23:12:18 -0400
At 05:20 PM 8/30/96 -0700, Steven Boozer wrote:
>>Since when is the suffix {-wI'} Type 9? Doesn't say anything like that in my
>>TKD! Look at 3.2.2.
>>
>>beHwI"av
>
>Look at the "Klingon Affixes" summary list, section 3 ("Verb suffixes") on
>pg. 164 (TKD, 2nd ed.).
>
>Voragh
Folks, if it is under KLBC, and someone is OBVIOUSLY having a grammar
problem... don't answer it until the BG does, okay? Thanks.
This is for YOUR protection, too... we have already had a few cases where
someone corrected someone else incorrectly. This person obviously was
confused about a grammar point, and that's for the BG to anser first... it's
what I am here for, after all. I really don't like wasting my time (or
yours!) writing these letters to remind you not to reply to grammar
questions until the BG does.
Thanks.
(I really hope Jay doesn't ditch my ability to mail because of this...
ghuy'cha'!)
--tQ
---
HoD trI'Qal, tlhIngan wo' Duj lIy So' ra'wI'
Captain T'rkal, Commander IKV Hidden Comet (Klingon speaker and net junkie!)
HaghtaHbogh tlhIngan yIvoqQo'! toH... qatlh HaghtaH Qanqor HoD???
monlI'bogh tlhInganbe' yIvoqQo'! SoHvaD monlI' trI'Qal...