tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 14 08:04:34 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: <K'>vaD ghItlhlu''a'?
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: <K'>vaD ghItlhlu''a'?
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 96 10:27:30 EST
Denny Shortliffe writes:
>Linguists have a term for vowels which go together (dipthong maybe?).
I suspect that Klingon linguists would *not* have a term for vowels
which go together. We've never seen any tlhIngan Hol words with
adjacent vowels, and the one tool that could create one (the suffix
{-oy}) is canonically suspected of having a {'} added before it to
keep vowels separated. Do you know what two fricatives in a row is
called? I've never needed a name for it, because I've never noticed
it happening in English. (Russian does it, I think: "tovarishch"?)
It's clear from inspection that each tlhIngan Hol syllable contains
one and only one vowel. Dipthongs do not appear.
>In
>any case, the point is that the name {mayq} doesn't end in {yq} though
>it may look like it does. In fact, it ends in {q} since the {ay} group
>is indivisible.
There is no "{ay} group" in tlhIngan Hol. The letter {a} is defined
as a vowel, and the letter {y} is defined as a consonant. In making
a distinction between the tlhIngan Hol consonant {y} and the English
semivowel "y", I sometimes think of {y} as a voiced "h" sound (similar
to a "zh" but made with the back of the tongue instead of the front).
It's not like an English "ee"; we don't find it forming dipthongs.
Nobody claimed that "K'Pach" is a tlhIngan Hol name anyway. It could
easily be the Federation [mis]spelling of {qep'aj}, or {qa'pach}, or
it could even be a formal Klingonaase corruption of {*qotlhpach}. :-)
-- ghunchu'wI'