tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 06 17:03:59 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC: Two quick questions
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: RE: KLBC: Two quick questions
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 1996 20:03:35 -0500
ghItlh ter'eS
>> ...Look on TKD 25: {-Daj} refers to "his," "her," or "its." This suffix can
>> refer to objects as well as people.
>
>Actually, Okrand isn't consistent with this. In TKD, pages 162 and 165, he
>defines it as "his/her" only. Is there any canon to clear this up?
Gee, how much more canon do you want? As SuStel said, it's right there
in TKD 3.3.4, when the suffix is presented for the first time. It looks
clear enough to me...
-- ghunchu'wI'