tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 03 17:06:57 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: KLBC - Trick or Treat

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: KLBC - Trick or Treat
• Date: Sun, 3 Nov 96 23:04:47 UT

jatlh taDI'oS vIq:

>  bIDubqu'!  Hol wIghojmeH, batlh wISuqmeH je wIja'chuq 'ej tlhIngan Hol 
wIlo'
>
>  jabbI'IDvam latlh 'ay' janglaH taghwIpu' pabpo' neH.

Aha!  I'd hardly call you a beginner, taDI'oS, jupwI', but since you posted 
under KLBC, I feel obliged to point out your errors . . . :)

You said {Hol wIghojmeH, batlh wISuqmeH je}.  We have precedent (TKW, Star 
Trek: Klingon) that you connect these phrases with the sentence conjunctions 
{'ej}, {qoj}, {pagh}, and not the noun conjunctions.  Therefore, this phrase 
would have to be {Hol wIghojmeH 'ej batlh wISuqmeH}.

{wIja'chuq}  We discuss what?  Perhaps you mean {tlhIngan Hol wIja'chuq}?  
(I'm not even going to get into the question of whether {ja'chuq} can be 
considered a seperate, transitive verb . . .)  There was no other context to 
suggest anything else.  Still, I'm unsure . . .

SuStel
Stardate 96843.1

• Follow-Ups:
  • NOT KLBC
    • From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: Qochmeychaj tlhInganpu'
• Next by Date: RE: KLBC: mughmey
• Prev by thread: RE: KLBC - Trick or Treat
• Next by thread: NOT KLBC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level