tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Nov 03 19:24:58 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
NOT KLBC
- From: "Donald E. Vick" <[email protected]>
- Subject: NOT KLBC
- Date: Sun, 3 Nov 1996 19:11:13 -0800 (PST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "David Trimboli" at Nov 3, 96 05:11:24 pm
> {wIja'chuq} We discuss what? Perhaps you mean {tlhIngan Hol wIja'chuq}?
> (I'm not even going to get into the question of whether {ja'chuq} can be
> considered a seperate, transitive verb . . .) There was no other context to
> suggest anything else. Still, I'm unsure . . .
Until we have something to establish whether ja'chuq is transitive or
not, I have decided to dodge the whole issue and just use it whichever way is
most convenient at the moment. :)
taDI'oS vIq, law'wI'pu'vaD Holtej jIH
----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Thaddaeus Vick, Linguist to the Masses | [email protected] -or- |
| | [email protected] |
| gules on a saltire argent voided azure | |
| thirteen mullets of the second. Yeeha. | http://www.crl.com/~dvick |
----------------------------------------------------------------------