tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 12 10:23:31 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nabwIj - tlhIngan wo' batlh
>Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 08:50:44 -0800
>From: "d'Armond Speers" <[email protected]>
>The Anthem predates a lot of our knowledge of Klingon, though. He also
>uses lots (okay, a couple of) verb+ghach constructions, with no
>intervening suffixes.
Yes, since it predates our knowledge that verb+ghach was naughty.
> Not that we've had any recent enlightenment of the
>use of number+DIch. I think, though, that if Krankor were writing the
>Anthem today, he'd do many things differently.
Possibly... but don't be *too* sure. :) Krankor was none too pleased with
Okrand for having "changed" the ruling on "-ghach"... He might do things
just for spite.
>Hmm, I thought it was /wIHeghmoHmo'/. I'll look it up when I get home.
I was going from memory...
~mark