tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Dec 18 15:45:15 1996

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

RE: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh

• From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
• Subject: RE: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 96 23:09:35 UT

December 18, 1996 4:37 PM, jatlh HurghwI':

> I think the problem is I'm not using Hoch correctly. Would you understand if
> I said:
> SoH rurbe'bogh Hoch nuv vISovbogh
> 
> I thought Hoch was used like a verb, in that if you had a noun phrase {SoH
> rurbe'bogh nuv} it would precede the whole phrase. Do you see what I'm
> getting at?

No!  {Hoch} is a noun.  It can either stand alone meaning "all" or 
"everything," or it can come in front of a noun, to mean "all <noun>s" or 
"every <noun>."

By now I've forgotten the original thought here.  I suggest you recast with 
fewer relative clauses.

-- 
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 96966.4

• Prev by Date: RE: KLBC: Joints
• Next by Date: RE: typo indeed!
• Prev by thread: Re: RE: mu'tlheghmey javDIch vImugh
• Next by thread: [Fwd: Star Trek: Klingon CD-ROM]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level