tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 01 14:09:25 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
RE: KLBC on naming convention
- From: "David Trimboli" <[email protected]>
- Subject: RE: KLBC on naming convention
- Date: Sun, 1 Dec 96 22:05:50 UT
Sunday, December 01, 1996 11:46 AM, jatlh HurghwI':
> >> qay'be'lIj 'oH nuq?
> >
> >{qay'} is NOT a noun. It is a verb. {qatlh SoHvaD qay' jabbI'IDwIj?}
>
> Not quite the same . . . how about:
> SoHvaD qay' nuq?
maj. 'ach mu'tlheghwIj qar law' mu'tlheghlIj qar puS. {{:-P
> >> janglaH Hoch jIjangpa', 'ach pab lughmoHlaHbe' vay' jIjangpa'.
> >
> >nuqjatlh?
>
> Dayajbe''a'? vImugh:
mu'tlheghlIj Qav neH vIyajbe'.
> Everyone can reply before you, but anyone can not correct before you.
bIjatlhHa'. <bIjangpa' janglaH Hoch, 'ach bIlughmoHpa' lughmoH pagh.>
> >QaghDI' taghwI', yIlughmoHQo'. mu'mey chu' yIchupQo'. mu'tlheghmey chu'
> >yIchupQo'. yIja'chuq neH! yIja'chuqtaHqu'! 'ach QaghDI' taghwI',
yIqImQo'!
>
> wejpuH. qaDlIj meqmey vIyajbe'.
nuqjatlh? qaqaDbe'. qara'qu'!
> jabbI'IDvetlhDaq Qaghmey vI'angta'be'.
> jabbI'ID wa'DIch vIwuvta'be'.
jIyajbej. Dap Dajatlhlaw'.
> jabbI'IDDaq pIm, mu'meyvetlh rap vIjatlhchugh, DaSaHbe'!
This is *still* under KLBC!
When using adjectival verbs along with nouns with a Type 5 suffix, the suffix
goes on the *verb*. {jabbI'ID pImDaq}.
nuq Dajatlh 'e' DanID?
> jIHvaD qay' Doch pIm.
> vIqawbogh jabbI'IDDaq, pab lulughmoHbejta' ghotmey pIm bIjangpa'.
> 'ach bIjatlhbe'! qatlh chaH bIqImbe', 'ach reH choqaD?
So far, all evidence points to {qIm} being intransitive. Besides, you've used
the wrong suffix. {qatlh chaHvaD bIqImbe'}.
qaD Dapar'a'? wejpuH!
motlh batlhHa' vang vay', QuvDajDaq jabbI'ID vIlab 'ej jIjatlh <jIjangpa'
yIjangQo'>. rut jabbI'IDghomDaq ghuHmoHwI'vam vIlab. SoHvaD vIlab. QeychoH
QeH, 'ach batlhHa' chopum'a'!
> >pab DalughmoH 'e' DanIDDI' qoj mu'tlheghmey chu' DachupDI' rut bIQagh
SoH'e'!
>
> bIlugh, 'ach Hatchugh Qaghmey, ghomvamvaD ghItlh taghwI' pabpo' neH! taghwI'
> mu'tlheghmeyDaj wa'DIch nIS QaghmeywIj.
If you've got the two nouns, one the possessor and the other being possessed,
you don't need the suffix {-Daj}.
qayajmeH, Qatlh. QaQ tlhIngan HollIj, 'ach taQ mu'meylIj.
Your conversation seems a little disjointed to me. I'm not sure I can follow
this.
> >vaj mISchoHbejqu' taghwI', qar'a'? baQa'!
>
> vay' lughbe' laDchugh taghwI', mISchoH ghaH!
<vay' lughmoHbe'> bIjatlh 'e' DaHech'a'?
> chaq HatchoH Qaghmey? DaneH'a'?
> jabbI'IDvetlhDaq, taghwI' mu'tlheghmeyDaj wa'DIch SaH qechmeywIj.
I still can't follow what you're saying. Here's the deal: go ahead and answer
questions posted under KLBC, but don't reply to grammar, word choices, etc.!
If someone says {jih Santa Claus}, don't go pointing out their spelling errors
or their mis-ordered words. I'll do that. However, please do contribute by
answering such an outlandish statement! {Santa Claus SoHchugh, targhna' jIH}
COMPLETELY IGNORE ALL ERRORS! yaj'a'? Qochbe''a'?
--
SuStel
Beginners' Grammarian
Stardate 96919.7