tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Apr 28 12:18:08 1996
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC naDev jIH vItu'lu'
- From: "Robyn Stewart" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC naDev jIH vItu'lu'
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 12:19:17 PST
- Organization: NLK Consultants, Inc.
- Priority: normal
On 28 Apr 96, Alan Anderson wrote:
& ghItlh wovwI' (Robyn Stewart):
& >DaH jISo'Ha'rup.
&
& bI'ang'eghmo' qaHoy'.
jISeyqu'! tlhInganHey Hol vIjatlhbogh Dayaj.
& A minor point of vocabulary: we know that {So'}
& means "hide something else" -- {So'wI'} is a cloaking device -- so you
& probably should use the verb suffix {-'egh} and say {jISo'Ha''eghrup}.
& Or you might choose the verb {'ang} "reveal" instead of {So'Ha'}.
jIQoch. TKDDaq nav javmaH Hut yIlegh. <nuqDaq So'taH yaS> = Where
is the officer hiding? So'eghqu'bejtaH yaS. vaj <'egh>
ghItlhnISbe'lu'. chaq So'egh je So'wI' vIja'laH. 'ach
mu'tlheghvamvaD <'ang> vImaSmo' SughoHnISbe'. jI'ang'eghta'.
& reH <-taH> tlha' <-vIS>, vaj <qaStaHvIS> DaghItlhnIS.
taH Qaghna'vatlh <-taH> <-vIS> je vIghItlhtaHvIS! pIj
mojaqmeyvam vIghItlhHa'. jItuH.
& >*wovwI'* tupong 'e' vItul. tugh lut vIghItlhbogh SalI'.
&
& You've also used verb prefixes that don't match the actual object
& of the verb: {'e' muja'}, {lut SalI'}, etc ... There is
& canon to support using the verb prefix to indicate the "indirect
& object" in some cases ...
bIlughchu'. I am incorrectly trying to stretch verb prefixes to
represent indirect objects. Would <tlhIHvaD lut vIlI'> be correct?
You honour me with your assistance. My knowledge rises like a well
fed tribble population. jIyajlaw' bIQIjmo'.
wovwI'