tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Nov 29 19:43:39 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: maH chaHbogh maHbe'
- From: [email protected] (Alan Anderson)
- Subject: Re: maH chaHbogh maHbe'
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 1995 22:44:04 -0500
ghItlh taghqIj:
>mu'tlheghwIj DayajlaHpu'. "We are not who we are" vIjatlh vIneHpu' 'e'
>Dayajpu'. qatlh mu'tlheghvam vIjatlh vIneHpu' Dayajbe'pu' neH. 'ach potlhbe'
>meqwIj. potlh pabwIj'e'.
'ach jIyajbe'qu'! mu'tlheghlIj vImughpu' neH. 'oH vIyajbe'.
maQumqu'be'. potlhbej pab 'ach potlh qech je.
jIyaj vIneH 'ach bIQIjQo'. jIjeghrup.
>[that third sentence: I am not sure about the accepted usage of the
>questions as relative pronouns. I tried to say 'You merely did not
>understand why I wanted to write this sentence.']
It's close enough. I understood it without effort.
-- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj