tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Nov 16 04:45:13 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Confusion and unconditional surrender (was: vocabulary..)
On Wed, 15 Nov 1995, Alan Anderson wrote:
> vanya writes:
> >*slipper*meywIj mojpu' no'lI' SurghDu' ;P
> >
> I like it! Though I think it's not quite an insult. It's more of a taunt.
> If you want to emphasize an "I did it" meaning, you can say something like
> {waqHom moj no'lI' SurghDu' 'e' vIqaSmoHta'}. I've taken the liberty of
> using the word {waqHom} here; I hope it fits what you want it to mean.
Um, excpet for that pesky TKD 6.2.5, "In complex sentences of this type
[sentence as object], the second verb never takes an aspect suffix
(section 4.2.7)". Aspect needs to come from the verb in the sentence
which is the object of /qaS/.
> -- ghunchu'wI' batlh Suvchugh vaj batlh SovchoH vaj
--Holtej