tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Nov 10 05:00:11 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: Re[4]: ranks and titles (was Suppletion)

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: Re[4]: ranks and titles (was Suppletion)
• Date: Fri, 10 Nov 1995 07:59:37 -0500

ghItlh yoDtargh:

>Therefore I think {ta'be'} would be appropriate to describe the female 
>consort of an emperor, while {be'ta'} would be used if the sovereign 
>were female.

I've been following this conversation with a little confusion.  Is <ta'be>
canon?  I don't know the source.  Without that knowledge, I would have
thought that the gender of the ruler would be immaterial.  The ruler would be
<ta'>, and his/her consort would be <be'nal> or <loDnal>.

jIlugh'a'?

SuStel
Hovjaj 95856.8

• Prev by Date: Re: Responses to Vocabluary
• Next by Date: Re: Sign Language?
• Prev by thread: Re[7]: ranks and titles (was Suppletion)
• Next by thread: Re[5]: ranks and titles (was Suppletion)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level