tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri May 05 11:27:43 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))

From: "William H. Martin" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
Date: Fri, 5 May 95 14:28:07 EDT
In-Reply-To: <Pine.3.89.9505031926.A28324-0100000@netcom10>; from "R.B Franklin" at May 3, 95 11:08 pm

According to R.B Franklin:
> 
> 
> 
> Wed, 3 May 1995, ghItlh charghwI':
> 
> > I thought it might be even MORE insulting as no'law'lI'. qar'a'?
> 
> wot mojaq 'oH <-law'>'e'.  DIp mojaq poQ mu'vam.  rurchuqmo' <-law'> <-Hey> 
> je chaq <-Hey> Dajatlh 'e' DaHech qar'a'?

bIqarchu'. qatlho'.

> > charghwI'
> 
> yoDtargh
> 
charghwI'
-- 

 \___
 o_/ \
 <\__,\
  ">   | Get a grip.
   `   |

References:
- Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
  - From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: "size" and -ghach
Next by Date: Re: Transitivity
Prev by thread: Re: pagh no'lI' (was: Re: pagh (was latlh))
Next by thread: Re: As much as.....
Index(es):

Back to archive top level