tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Dec 24 22:04:00 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: NEED A RULEING....

• From: [email protected]
• Subject: Re: NEED A RULEING....
• Date: Mon, 25 Dec 1995 01:03:28 -0500

In a message dated 95-12-24 16:44:56 EST, you write:

>>Keep in mind <vaj> is not a temporal "then" . <vaj>  best translates as 
>>"therefore" or "thus".
>>> 
>>> peHruS
>>> 
>>
>>
>
>I have asked before how we would say "thence."  It was yoDtargh or ~mark who
>replied that {vaj} is still the answer.  Unfortunately, I cannot give the
>reference as it was at least six months ago.  I simply remember asking and
>getting an answer.
>
>peHruS

I want to add here that I often use {-mo'} when translating "since," when it
means "thus, therefore."  After {-mo'} I still consider {vaj} optional.

I very often use {vaj} after {-chugh}, not always.

peHruS

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NEED A RULEING....
    • From: "R.B Franklin" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: tlhIngan Hol in EGM!!
• Next by Date: Re: Merry Christmas
• Prev by thread: Merry Christmas
• Next by thread: Re: NEED A RULEING....
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level