tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Tue Mar 29 09:05:47 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KBLC - RE: Help please
- From: Topic Goran <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KBLC - RE: Help please
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 94 5:06:20 METDST
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from "trI'Qal" at Mar 28, 94 6:06 pm
- Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
> Ohhh... this is tricky. Part of what confused me was your law'/pus with <nuq>
> in both the noun slots. I would have said <nuq qaq law' Hoch qaq puS>, "What
> is the most preferable?" (using your change from <QaQ> to <qaq>). Reversing
Yeah, you use the superlative. I am not so sure about that. What is the most
preferable really doesn't fit my ear when you compare two things. But it is
probably cleaner than my version, I see why use it. But I would like to know
is my sentence grammatical? (nuq qaq law' nuq qaq puS) Can it be done, I mean
two {nuq}s in one sentence?
> When I can think of a good way to explain verb prefixes, I will post an
> explaination on them. It seems many people are getting them confused. Look
> for it by this weekend.
Umm, I doubt there is really anything to explain. They need to be memorised
and one should concentrate on the absence/person/plurality of the object
and not write automatically as some of us are likely to do. That's all.
No explaining necessary. I know perfectly well that I say
jISop. qagh vISop. qagh DaSop DaneH'a' je? HIja', yISop! bISopchugh bIghungHa'.
But sometimes I just don't pay enough attention to the prefix. Qu'vatlh! {{:^(
> --Hod trI'Qal
reH jaghlI'pu' Dajonjaj!
qoran