tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 19 07:04:08 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: providing translation
- From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: providing translation
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 1994 14:54:09 -0400 (EDT)
Qanqoroyvo':
>I'm going to flagrantly abuse my power as Grammarian and post
>occasional things to the beginner conversation *without*
>translation. I think I can be counted on to post things which are
>correct, comprehensible, and avoid controversial areas of grammar.
>However, I will continue to support the rule that everybody else
>*will* include the translation. If they want, some other advanced people
>can be given permission to ignore this requirement as well, on
>request. This will mean that, in general, beginner posts will have
>translations, but there will still be a *few* kicking around that
>people will have to work through for themselves. Acceptible?
>
> --Krankor
Qanqor, add one more to the "count" I owe you (So it's what, four now?).
anyone who thinks their posts are readable enough that beginners can learn
from them without translation, contact me at [email protected].
Off the top of my head, I *know* I have never had any problems with any of
Qanqor's, or ~mark's posts, and very rarely with charghwI's.
The next question I have is this: do the beginners wish *me* to continue to
provide my translations? I have been to this point, and shall continue to do
so until I have an indication that this is no longer desired. Anyone who has
an opinion on this one way or the other, email me *privately* to
[email protected]. I don't want to clutter the list with 'votes'
like this. {{:/
--HoD trI'Qal