tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 19 03:24:58 1994

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Spring Break

• From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Spring Break
• Date: Sat, 19 Mar 1994 16:22:11 -0400 (EDT)

Qanqoroyvo':


>Sigh.  Not correct.  -Qo' is absolutely allowed on non-imperative
>verbs.  Go back and read 4.3 (page 47) again.  Everyone gets to give
>the BG a lash with a wet noodle.


*is lashed*


>>qatlh pImev wIneHqu'???  {{:)
>
>This is also erroneous.  Remember again that this is one of those
>sentence-as-object cases, and, as such, is really two sentences.
>It is the second sentence which is the question, and therefore qatlh
>should go at the head of it.  Thus:
>
>pImev qatlh wIneHqu'???
>
>                --Krankor

DaH HIHegh!  jIquvHa''eghqa'moH!  {{:(


--HoD trI'Qal

• Prev by Date: Translate "Magic"
• Next by Date: Re: law'/puS
• Prev by thread: Re: KLBC: Spring Break
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Spring Break
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level