tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Nov 20 17:40:59 1993
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nujDaq qam lanpu' vay'
- From: Peter Garza <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: nujDaq qam lanpu' vay'
- Date: Sat, 20 Nov 1993 19:40:53 -0600 (CST)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Captain Krankor" at Nov 19, 93 04:05:20 am
By the time I respond to this, HoD Qanqor will have left (I think). So
my comments to his comments are directed to all.
> Both are serious problems. 'e'mo' is an old saw. It would be wonderful
> if it were legal, but there is not yet enough evidence to claim it is.
> You have to restructure the sentence.
I already asked about this to Mr. Shoulsen in another message.
>
> Similarly, the 'ar thing needs restructuring. The basic tack is to turn
> the thing into a noun, using -ghach, so that it becomes a legal candidate
> for 'ar.
>
The other option I was thinking of used "-ghach" for "You don't know how
much embarrassement I had."
tuHghach 'ar vIghaj 'e' DaSovbe' (I think "tuH" was the verb I used)
> Aside from these, it was a great translation, and a wonderful story!
qatlho'
> --Krankor
>
>
Peter Garza
[email protected]