tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Feb 09 05:32:34 2012
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [Tlhingan-hol] Semantic roles with -moH... again
jatlhpu' quljIb, jatlh:
> {HIp vItuQmoH} - I dress (someone) in a uniform.
> {HIp vItuQeghmoH} - I dress myself in a uniform.
jang Qov, jatlh:
> If it's vItuQ'eghmoH, sure.
jIjang je jIH, jIjatlh:
> {vItuQ'eghmoH} DaghItlhHa'ba'pu'.
jang De'vID, jatlh:
> tay' {vI-}, {-'egh} je net chaw''a'?
The {-moH} adds an object to otherwise objectless verbs, so I
don't see why it shouldn't be fine to use {vI-} with {-'eghmoH}.
Though I can't find any canon examples of {-'eghmoH} with an
overt direct object or a corresponding prefix, the paq'batlh
does contain an example of {-chuqmoH} with an overt object:
Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS
Kahless united the tribes of Kronos (paq'batlh p.179)
QeS 'utlh
_______________________________________________
Tlhingan-hol mailing list
[email protected]
http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol