![[KLI Member]](/pics/KLImemberbutton.gif "[KLI Member]"){kind=small}
![[Hol po'wI']](/pics/level3_big.png "[Hol po'wI']"){kind=small}
My opinion:
'ach chay' {Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS} DaQIj?
QeS 'utlh:
> Qo'noS tuqmey muvchuqmoH qeylIS
> Kahless united the tribes of Kronos (paq'batlh p.179)
qaStaH nuq jay'?
chay' mu'tlheghvam chenlu'?
It took me a moment to figure out what the matter could be, because the sentence seems so natural, and then I saw the apparent violation of the prefix for {-chuq}. I think it's fine, and I think that's because {-moH} rewires the sentence. Seeing the order of a sentence reverse when adding {-moH} is nothing new.
Qong Qang. Qang vIQongmoH.Just as {qarIQ} is nonsense and {qarIQmoH} is unremarkable, {muvchuq} can't take an object but {muvchuqmoH} practically requires one. Yup, it violates TKD 4.2.1, but it's very easy for me to see this as something that isn't in section 4.2.1 because matlh/MO didn't think of it at the time. If it were a known rule, I'd probably leave it out the first time I explained {-chuq/-'egh} to a newcomer anyway.
I'm quite delighted there is canon to support it, because otherwise I'd have to apologize for doing it unconcernedly.
And now I'm going to stop responding to these threads until I have a better grasp of canon myself. If you see me pontificating on these things again, quiz me on Skybox.
- Qov
_______________________________________________ Tlhingan-hol mailing list [email protected] http://stodi.digitalkingdom.org/mailman/listinfo/tlhingan-hol